Why you should never invest in stocks?

Not Financially Ready to Invest. The stock market is known to have a little higher risk than many other types of investments, since it invests in companies. If you have debt, especially credit card debt, or really any other personal debt that has a higher interest rate. For the past 50 years it has been a widespread belief that, if you are a long-term investor, your best return will be in stocks.

Almost every financial advisor will tell a 30-year-old to put more than 90% of their portfolio in stocks. Most people above the median have a substantial allocation of their liquid portfolio in the stock market. Some people choose individual issues (Apple, GE, Wal-Mart, etc. Stock prices seem to be a mystery to even the most experienced investor.

There are often market swings of more than 1% per day. Most investors argue that fundamentals (such as expected gains) drive. That doesn't seem to be a full explanation, since we've had a market that has basically remained stable since the late 1990s. To be a long-term stock investor, you need to read the public's mind.

You should only put your money in the stock market if you think everyone else will keep money there. Therefore, to inform your portfolio allocation, we want to determine if money will flow to the market or leave it in the next 30 years. Retail investors, through their 401 (k) retirement plans and pension plans, are one of the largest groups of investors in public equities. One of the main reasons the market has remained stable over the past 15 years (and hasn't collapsed) is because so much retirement money has hit the market.

Most of that money is in the hands of people who are about to retire and are likely to exit the market, albeit slowly, in the next 30 years. Globalization has been a huge boom in the market in the last 30 years. Nowadays it's easy for anyone in the world to buy U, S. Stocks; The United States has historically been the safest place to put your money.

Because of this, we have seen a massive influx of capital from all over the world, and especially from oil-rich countries that need to invest their profits in a historically secure environment. Globalization also means greater competition from former participants, as well as from start-ups. Startups are disrupting old but profitable businesses, sometimes giving away commodities for free. We see that time and again, new participants deliver lunch to major companies.

In every major field (including software, computers, energy, retail, media, defense, and the pharmaceutical industry), established players (those with the highest market maps) are being pressured by the small. All of this means that the average time a company will be a member of the S%26P 500 should decrease significantly. In the 80s, 90s and 2000s, technology companies drove much of the market growth. Microsoft (in 1998) and Dell (in 1998) went public while they were still extremely fast-growing companies, and investors in the public market were able to handle upward growth.

Even recent IPOs, such as Google (200), Salesforce (also 200) and Amazon (199), were made public soon enough that investors could share in substantial profits as companies grew. Remember that Amazon wasn't profitable until 2001, four years after it went public. Today, due to the abundance of private capital and regulations such as Sarbanes-Oxley, technology companies go public much later in their development. Companies like LinkedIn and Facebook were able to delay their IPO by 2 to 3 years because they had access to private capital at an advanced stage.

And while biotech companies are still publicly traded before being profitable, we're likely to see more and more companies waiting to go public. In today's world, public market investors don't derive as much benefit from a company's initial growth (most of that profit will go to private equity funds). Therefore, one of the biggest drivers of market growth, advanced technology companies, is shrinking substantially. Taxes on Long-Term Capital Gains in the U.S.

UU. In the 1990s and 2000s, we saw a substantial decline in the tax rate on capital gains, while taxes on ordinary income have remained basically stable for those who earn the most money. Can Interest Rates Be Nearly Zero Forever? Clearly, the answer is no. The government will have to inflate to get out of its huge debt.

In any scenario, interest rates cannot go down. When interest rates rise, future company profits will suffer (and if that's not already included in the price, stocks will fall). It's very difficult to buy shares. It's not just about choosing stocks and seeing them go up 10,000%.

It's buying them and seeing them go down 80% before they end up going up 20% of your original price. Psychology is at least 80% of the game. I don't need to go over the statistics. Most people sell at the bottom and buy at the top.

Do you know what happens when some of those documents change a little? A week later a press release comes out. Opens up or down 50%. Who will win the dollar? You or the guy who wrote 100,000 lines of code going through FDA databases. I would never trust any number that comes out in a 10T, no matter how compatible it is with GAAP according to government standards.

But the 200mm iPads are going to be sold in the coming years. So it turns out that I like Apple. See also, “Apple will be the first trillion dollar company”) I have created 20 companies, 17 of which have failed. But I've learned a lot along the way.

If I don't know how a company makes money, it will be difficult for me to determine if it will succeed in the long term. Transferring a share for this reason doesn't mean it's a bad investment, just that it's bad for me. Someone who is more familiar with the industry and the company will be able to read the signals better than me to identify when a company is making smart moves and when it is doing wrong. Before investing, consider a fund's investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses.

Since many of these people have retirement income to live on, they could flee stock market volatility and move to safer investments. Disciplined investors who disconnected from the noise and remained investing in stocks were rewarded in the long term. The level of risk associated with a particular investment or asset class typically correlates with the level of return that the investment could achieve. The timing of buying and selling an investment are key determinants of investment return (along with fees).

However, historical data should not mislead investors to think that there is no risk in investing in stocks for a long period of time. If you invest in the stock market, you must have the ability to overcome it in the long term (overcome the ups and downs). and some invest in managed mutual funds (for example Fidelity), while others invest in index funds (the Vanguard S%26P 500 fund, for example). If you buy a stock or equity investment fund when the market is hot and prices are high, you will have greater losses if the price drops for any reason compared to an investor who bought at a lower price.

Investors who hold individual stocks for an extended period of time also run the risk of the company they invest in going into a state of permanent decline or bankruptcy. In many cases, they make an already difficult decision to commit their money to even more difficult investments, leading some to not invest at all. These are generally not sound long-term investments, and there is a high probability that you could lose most or all of your investment once investors in meme stocks move on to something else. .

.

Leave Message

All fileds with * are required